Over the last year I have gradually taken on reporting, vendor coordination and training newer people. None of these arrived as a formal promotion. They were each a reasonable 'can you handle this?' and now they add up to a noticeably different job.
I do not mind the work, which is probably why I let the change happen without much resistance. Some of it is more interesting than what I was hired to do. What bothers me is the possibility of letting the role drift indefinitely because there was never one dramatic moment where it changed. Six small additions can still become a different position.
I have started writing down recurring responsibilities rather than collecting isolated examples of times I was busy. That makes the shift much clearer: which meetings I now own, which reports depend on me, who I train, which vendors come to me first, and what decisions I make without escalation. I also want to separate temporary coverage from work the company now considers permanently mine.
My plan is to take that list into the next review and ask a fairly neutral question: is this still considered my original role with some extra duties, or has the role itself changed? If it has changed, I want to discuss title and compensation using the actual scope rather than arguing that I 'work hard.'
I am not looking to threaten resignation or demand a retroactive promotion. I mainly do not want ambiguity to become the company's easiest option forever. Has anyone handled role creep this way, and did documenting the ongoing scope help the conversation stay concrete?
1 reply
Documenting the ongoing scope usually helps because it takes the emotion out of it. I would just avoid making the case sound like a complain...
Documenting the ongoing scope usually helps because it takes the emotion out of it. I would just avoid making the case sound like a complaint about extra work; make it sound like a role description.
That last bit matters. Once it sounds like a role description, the conversation gets a lot less slippery.
3 replies
Your list is exactly the right move. A bunch of small tasks can become a new job without anyone saying it out loud.
Your list is exactly the right move. A bunch of small tasks can become a new job without anyone saying it out loud.
That is what I’m trying to pin down. It feels real in the week-to-week work, but invisible in title and pay.
I’d bring the list and ask which parts are expected going forward versus temporary coverage. That distinction usually matters more than the title argument.
Agreed. If they say “temporary” three months in a row, it is not temporary anymore.